We need to make a rule about what constitutes 'breaking news'. Here I am sitting on the floor after a vigorous 8-minute DIY yoga session and trying to read the very important comments thread on a very important article in The Guardian ("How to make the perfect cup of coffee"). All of a sudden, I'm interrupted by this giant red pop-up that says the head of Sony Pictures is stepping down following the hacking scandal.
Um, I guess that's interesting. But could it really not wait? Would it have been that horrible for me to continue reading the coffee comments for another few minutes before clicking back to the homepage and discovering that some lady quit her job?
Image via Wikimedia Commons |
I still remember when KREM 2 local news in Spokane cut into the Orpah show to announce that, and I quote, there was "heavy puddling" on Spokane's streets due to, and I quote, "rain".
This is not the clip, and it's not even breaking news, but it does feature some vintage Orpah.
Oh, by the way, I'm not misspelling Orpah. I recently learned that's her real name. ORPAH. She changed it when people kept mispronouncing it, but I prefer the original. ORPAH. Say it with me. ORPAH.
Here's what you can interrupt regularly scheduled broadcasting for:
- Live hostage situations
- Death of a famous or interesting world leader (Obama, Merkel, Putin, Kim Jong-un, etc.)
- Alien invasion
- Death of a relatively unknown or boring world leader (Cameron, Abbott, Jinping, etc.)
- Bey/Jay official divorce announcement
- Stock market crashes (unless it's the next Great D'presh, nobody cares!)
- Heavy puddling on Spokane's streets
- The mayor did or said something
- Lohan, Bieber or Bynes hit something with their car
Good evening,
Margaret
No comments:
Post a Comment