A french judge has just ruled that a couple can't name their newborn daughter Nutella.
Why?
Well, as the judge so matter-of-factly stated: it's "the trade name of a spread." You have a point there, judge. But on the other hand, Nutella actually sounds like a girl's name. It's not as crazy as naming your kid Kleenex or Nestle Tollhouse (although that does have a nice ring to it).
Thanks, Anna, for letting me use the torso of your child (without asking). |
Here's the kicker. The parents didn't bother to show up at court! So guess what the judge did? He named the girl himself! He went with "Ella", which makes sense as a shortened version of Nutella. But he could have gone with 'Hazel' to keep a bit more with the theme. Or what about 'Nuttah', the traditional Native American name meaning 'my heart'? That would have worked too!
All I'm saying is this:
- Nixing 'Nutella' as a baby name? I'm generally OK with the logic behind that.
- Taking it upon yourself to pick a new name for the kid? I find that a little presumptuous. At least give the parents another chance at naming her. They can phone you with their second choice (they don't really need to be in court for that).
OK, that's all for today. Anyone else craving crêpes?
Love,
Margaret
Margaret
No comments:
Post a Comment